- DISPLACEMENT IN PRIOR CANDLE: Examples in which price is to undergo weak displacement through an FVG in a candle prior to the initiation of a 15M reasoning move will be included, but will have two measurements in relation to the “Close of Candle” sentence, being measured from the close of the initial candle that displaced through it, labeled “1”, and the close of the candle that has initiated the 15M reasoning move, labeled “2”, determining the strength of the inverse FVG.
- REQUIRED TO MOVE TP: Examples which I am required to move my TP, in accordance with my data which indicates I am benefited most extensively by moving my TP when a new confluence is generated, will specify in the “Confluences” sentence the initial target and the new target, and their location. In terms of data, the initial confluence and its situation will be normally utilised, but the new confluence will be utilised only in regard to sentences discussing the new target confluences, in turn demonstrating the probability of the closest confluence being sought and the probability of targeting any said confluence.
- OBJECTIVE IS LIQUIDITY AND FVG: Examples in which the target confluence is both liquidity and FVG situated at the same level will see this data regarding the probability of these confluences being sought be included only in relation to the sentences purposed for them “Liquidity And FVG As Objective”.
- REASONING MOVE AND/OR ENTRY MODEL OBSERVED WITHIN THE CONFLUENCE: In the case that I am to be presented with the ability to scale down to look to act based off of my Reasoning Model and price is at the time located within the run through and/or weakly displaced through FVG, data will not be included and will rather be utilised in my seperate section purposed for this.
- Dates will be highlighted yellow when price is employing structure, whereas when a lack of structure is being employed, dates will be highlighted blue.
- As I will of course look to trade based off of this and in accordance with my other data, if I am presented with an entry opportunity and the full ability to enter and price is to stop the trade out prior to moving into any confluences, this will still be included, as it is realistically a manner that I would look to act based off of, and is something that effects the profitability of ignoring and acting based off of a weakly respected and/or run through inverse FVG.
- In the conclusions section, anything labelled “FVG As Objective”, refers to not only FVG’s as objectives, but also inverse FVG’s.
- When two confluences are to be at the same level, and price fails to undergo the complete reasoning move by seeking the probable confluence, if one of these two confluences has been pushed through and the other respected, the one that has been pushed through is still valid and should have data collected in the supports section, as it did not provide sufficient liquidity for price to move in the opposite direction, and its counterpart rather did. It should made clear in these examples, however, that this was the case, although data should otherwise be tracked normally.